Federalnaya Gazeta № 01 (132), January 2008 From the report “Between Science and Life is Knowledge”

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Opening address by Academician S.I. Vavilov at the opening of the constituent assembly
members of the All-Union Society for the dissemination of political and scientific knowledge.

Moscow, Bolshoi Theatre, July 7, 1947.
Comrades, we have gathered today within the walls of Moscow’s Bolshoi Theater, which has hosted so many historic conventions and meetings over the course of thirty Soviet years. We have before us an important and noble task: the creation of the All-Union Society for the dissemination of political and scientific knowledge. Our collective will, energy, and organization must make this meeting the beginning of a great and very necessary public affair for the entire Soviet people.
On May 1, 1947, a group of scientists, public and political figures, and workers of art appealed through the press to our intellectuals and scientific institutions with a proposal to establish an All-Union Society for the dissemination of political and scientific knowledge.
This endeavor immediately met with the approval and support of the Government. A decree of the USSR Council of Ministers transferred the Moscow Polytechnic Museum to the new Society and provided it with other facilities.
The appeal of the initiative group, published in all the newspapers, found a lively and concrete business echo in all strata of the population throughout the Soviet Union. The organizing committee of the Society has received and continues to receive many letters from our great scientists, intellectuals, students, workers, and peasants. These letters always express satisfaction and joy at the establishment of the Society, offer active assistance to its work in various forms, and sometimes make valuable practical suggestions.
The support of the Soviet Government and the ardent response of the public have strengthened our confidence in the timeliness and extreme necessity of the Society. Encouraged by this realization, the Organizing Committee began its work without delay. During the past two months, the Committee prepared this general meeting and drafted the Society’s Statutes, which are now being submitted to the meeting for consideration and approval. Necessary measures have been taken to create branch societies in the Union republics and in the largest centers of the RSFSR. 220 institutions were admitted to the Society as founding members. The Organizing Committee has so far approved about one and a half thousand full members of the Society.
Having received at its disposal, on the basis of the Government’s resolution, the apparatus and means of the former All-Union Lecture Bureau of the USSR Ministry of Higher Education, the Organizing Committee did not interrupt for a single day the regular work of the Lecture Bureau and organized a number of new lectures, especially on topical problems of science and technology. Since the beginning of the Organizing Committee’s work up to the present, about 500 lectures have been held in Moscow. Necessary measures have been taken to develop the building of the Polytechnic Museum and to organize the apparatus of the future board of the Society.
The purpose of the Society, at first glance, is so clear and obvious that a special consideration of it might seem superfluous. In reality, however, every day we encounter a wide variety of understandings and interpretations of the purpose and nature of its future activities. It is sometimes argued, for example, that the Society should be an association of numerous Soviet special scientific and technical societies, like the corresponding British and American associations.
This would mean that the Society should basically unite scientists of different specialties for the purpose of furthering the development of science in the USSR. The other point of view is that the task of the Society should only be the popularization of political and scientific knowledge, aimed at the widest circles of the Soviet Union’s population. From the comparisons of the two opinions cited, we can see how wide the gamut of different perceptions of the Society’s life is. Naturally, therefore, the founding congress of the Society will first have to come to an agreement on this question. Of course, even if we manage to reach a consensus, we should be aware that the practice of further work will inevitably introduce amendments into our positions and intentions. But certainty and clarity of the Society’s goals are indispensable for the beginning of the work.
In Europe the great social importance of science started to become clear from the 16th century on, when the collapse of the feudal society, the opening of printing, and the natural revolution began. In Russia, this understanding of the role of science became widespread in the Petrine era, from the end of the seventeenth century.
Science itself was a typical social phenomenon, necessarily associated with the activities of entire collectives. There was no scientist-Robinson, who drew his scientific knowledge and conclusions only for himself. The exchange of information, observations and logical conclusions, the collective discussion of scientific results, their criticism and comparison with each other, and the elimination of the unfit have been a necessary characteristic of science since time immemorial.

One of the first scientific books in Russia was a translation of Fontenelle’s Discourse on the Set of Worlds by Antioch Cantemir. The great Russian mathematician Leonhard Euler found time to compile a remarkable popular scientific work in three volumes – “Letters to a German Princess” – in which Euler’s physical and philosophical views were presented in an extremely accessible and simple form. Lomonosov in his “Word on the usefulness of chemistry”, addressing his audience, said: “The sciences… wish that not only this assembly, but the whole Fatherland would be pleased with its scientific sons. On the same occasion in his other public lecture – in “Word about the phenomena of the air, originating from electric power” – Lomonosov said: “On this everyone has no doubt, who measures the immeasurable benefits of science, widely spreading, in the enlightenment of people, by unbiased reasoning.
Of the widespread education, popular science literature, dreamed of a poet VA Zhukovsky: “We do not have yet useful books for the common man, and probably a long time will not have them, “- he wrote. “Are there many writers who would want to sacrifice their talent to such a circle of people, whose approval cannot be satisfied for the author’s ego…?” “We have an Academy of Sciences and Arts, why can’t we have an Academy for the enlightenment of commoners?” – he further remarked…
…Knowledge does not spread only through schools. Newspapers, books, lectures, exhibitions, radio – these are the many channels through which knowledge has been and must be poured into the masses in addition to schools. These sources of knowledge are not merely supplementary to school: they have a special character. It should not be forgotten that school is always limited, that when a person graduates from school, in many cases he remains with the stock of knowledge acquired for the rest of his life, unless there is a constant replenishment, refreshment and revision of that knowledge. This is true not only for people very far from science, but sometimes also for intellectuals, scientists and specialists. Real science is ever-living, ever-changing, never ending. Finished, ossified science becomes scholasticism. The special meaning of scientific propaganda and consists in the continuous renewal of knowledge. This kind of enlightenment concretizes the dialectical fluidity and life of real science.
We may now return to the question posed at the beginning. What should be the aim of the All-Union Society for the dissemination of political and scientific knowledge? The whole course of the history of our country during the Soviet years, all our aspirations clearly show that it would be a mistake to limit the activity of our Society to the scientific environment, to special scientific associations.
It would be no less a mistake, however, to believe that Society, to use V.A. Zhukovsky’s terminology, should disseminate our science only to “commoners. Our Society should be a conductor and intermediary of real, high, advanced scientific knowledge from specialists to the people.
If Galileo, Lomonosov, Euler, Mechnikov, and Timiryazev were able to write so that their works were comprehensible and deeply interesting to scientists-specialists and simultaneously to the broader circles of the intelligentsia-in very separate and closer to us times, then for the Soviet scientist this requirement must become obligatory.
We hope that the entire advanced scientific intelligentsia of the Soviet Union will be in the ranks of our Society. Broad public activity and initiative is a new element that is being introduced into the traditional Soviet cause of disseminating knowledge among the people.

WE LEARN TO LIVE IN THE 21ST CENTURY (from the address of Academician E. Malitikov)

“Life is the Science which has become Knowledge”

“Knowledge is Power when used by Life”

E. Malitikov

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]